![]() |
||
|
Monday, April 30, 2007
Program: "Energy Conservation in Adaptive Filtering" Synopsis: The purpose of this talk is to provide an overview of an energy conservation approach to the performance analysis of adaptive filters. The framework is based on studying the energy flow through successive iterations of an adaptive filter and on establishing a fundamental energy conservation relation; the relation bears resemblance with Snell’s Law in optics and has far reaching consequences to the study of adaptive schemes. In this way, many new and old results can be pursued uniformly across different classes of algorithms. In particular, the talk will highlight some recently discovered phenomena pertaining to the learning ability of adaptive filters. It will be seen that adaptive filters generally learn at a rate that is better than that predicted by least-mean-squares theory; that is, they are "smarter" than originally thought! It will also be seen that adaptive filters actually have two distinct rates of convergence; they learn at a slower rate initially and at a faster rate later; perhaps in a manner that mimics the human learning process. The speaker is being provided as part of the University of Delaware Electrical Engineering Lecture series. He will be presenting a talk to the EE Dept earlier in the day with the title "Distributed Processing over Adaptive Networks." You might want to review the topic "Adaptive Filters"; a simple review is contained in
wikipedia; a section of which is shown below. One way to remove the noise is to filter the signal with a notch filter at 50 Hz. However, due to slight variations in the power supply to the hospital, the exact frequency of the power supply might (hypothetically) wander between 47 Hz and 53 Hz. A static filter would need to remove all the frequencies between 47 and 53 Hz, which could excessively degrade the quality of the ECG since the heart beat would also likely have frequency components in the rejected range. To circumvent this potential loss of information, an adaptive filter could be used. The adaptive filter would take input both from the patient and from the power supply directly and would thus be able to track the actual frequency of the noise as it fluctuates. Such an adaptive technique generally allows for a filter with a smaller rejection range, which means, in our case, that the quality of the output signal is more accurate for medical diagnosis. |
||